Wednesday, December 2, 2009
A tale of two metropolitans: A culinary tour of Bengaluru
Thursday, October 15, 2009
A tale of two metropolitans: Cheesecakes, Blossom, and the Dark Knight
Saturday, September 26, 2009
A tale of two metropolitans: First Impressions
This is where the similarities end though. Mumbai – despite all the noises made by certain political parties – embraces all new comers immediately without any reservations. In Bengaluru, on the other hand, the new comers have to embrace the city. You will be hard pressed to find a decent vada pav tapri here, but you can be sure to find an Idli Sambar tapri in Mumbai. Some of the very first things that you will notice on entering Mumbai are the crowds, the filth, and the boiling temperatures; unless you happen to come on an early morning in the middle of the winter season. Whereas in Bengaluru, the most noticeable things are the pleasant weather, the neat surroundings (at least they are neat and clean compared to Mumbai), and the relatively sparse crowd. For someone who wants to live in the city, and yet wishes some quiet and peace, Bengaluru is the place to be. The relaxed and easy going life here is in complete contrast to the hustle and bustle of Mumbai. Though the old timers do tend to say that Bengaluru was a much better city 5-6 years back. The same can be said about Mumbai too I guess.
As I mentioned before, Bengaluru is a pretty laidback city. And this applies to all aspects of life here. It's not just the way people live here, it's also the way people carry out their businesses, the way they work, and the way they travel that is laid back. In Mumbai, if you do not have change to pay to a shopkeeper, they will scurry around to find some change; either from their gulla, from other shopkeepers, from rickshawallahs, or from the roadside panwallas. In Bengaluru, going out to for shopping is like wooing a girl. If you want to buy anything, you better have the right change in your pockets, or else be ready to be turned down by the shopkeeper (I have actually had this happening to me). Despite this laidback lifestyle, the drivers here can be pretty aggressive - though they still do not pose any challenges to the drivers from Delhi of course. If Mumbai's traffic problems arise from over-congestion, Bengaluru's arise from some of the stupidest driving I have ever seen. Imagine a truck driver driving down the wrong side of a narrow two-way lane just to avoid the traffic on the right side. He ends up creating traffic on both sides of the lane. Breaking of traffic signals is a common sight in a lot of cities. But generally you tend to break traffic lights only if you are sure not be caught in the traffic coming from the green light lane.
The most striking facet of Bengaluru is the divide of the classes; or rather how it is so visible. In Mumbai, it is often difficult to differentiate between a person working for a prestigious organization from person working in a call center. Most often than not, they will use the same mode of transport, have their afternoon tea at the same tapri, and both will end up having arguments on the same trivial issues. In Bengaluru however, the IT engineer uses a different mode of transport than say, a salesman. And this divide of the classes is also mirrored in the modes of transport available here. The BMTC* has six different bus services running in Bangalore. The normal buses (Parisara Vahini) - which are almost similar to our own BEST - the slightly better luxury buses (Pushpak), the G-buses (I still haven't been able to find out what the G stands for), and the luxury AC buses (Vayuvajra). You will never see a high level executive travelling in the normal bus, and you will very rarely see a common worker travelling in a better bus. In Mumbai, a person-holding-a-high-post-in-some-big-company will leave his house wearing formal clothes with the shirt sleeves rolled up as if he were going to beat someone up, his tie nicely folded up and tucked in his shirt pocket, with a suitcase in hand. He will get to his regular railway station (or bus stand), and when his usual train (or bus) arrives, he will get in with a great deal of gusto, and a great variety of swear words should he encounter some resistance. He will spend the rest of the time either reading a newspaper, chatting with his regular travelling group, or else having a heated argument with someone. A Bengalurian (I hope I am using the correct phrase here) working in a posh IT company, on the other hand, will catch an AC bus, or a rickshaw, and will get to his office without any struggles. The one similarity in this vastly dissimilar situation is that both the Mumbaikar and the Bengalurian, when they reach their respective offices, will be absolutely slick and clean. The Bengalurian because of the relatively effortless mode of transport, and the Mumbaikar, despite all the adventures that he has.
Another big difference between these two great cities is nightlife. Mumbai has one, Bengaluru doesn't. In Bengaluru, the weekend usually starts at 1900 hrs on Friday, ends at 2300 hrs on the same day, starts again at 1000 hrs on Saturday, end at 2300 hrs on Saturday, and follows the same schedule on Sunday. In Mumbai, the weekend begins on 2100 hrs on Friday and does not end till 2359 hrs on Sunday. One of the first things that my onsite manager told me was, "Do not stay out after 2300. Unless you are ready to pay lavishly to some cabbie." Even the bus services seem to get paralyzed after 2300 in Bengaluru.
All said and done, both cities have their own charm, their own fallacies, and their own atmosphere. And anyway, these are just the first impressions. More to come yet. Before signing off though...just a little incident that I encountered during my first weekend. I was in the Garuda mall - which happens to be the biggest mall in Bengaluru - and was waiting to order some food in the food court. I was just having a look around the food court when I saw two women - mother and daughter apparently - staring at a big television kept in one of the corners. From the look on their faces, I assumed that some bad news was being relayed on the news channel (and they usually have CNBC on here, which is no crappy channel). So I just leaned over to my side to see what was being broadcast and saw the main headline: “Rakhi Sawant to dump Elesh”. Well I guess some things just don't change anywhere.
Friday, July 24, 2009
Mondays, mountaneering and a trip to Heaven
Mondays are always hard to deal with when you get back to office. The cobwebs in your mind which have accumulated over the weekend, the stiff limbs, the mountain of work awaiting you (especially if you are catering to clients in a different time zone) etc. Last Monday however, something seemed different. I did have a large stack of work (it was going to be the busiest week in the past couple of months). But I did not feel depressed by the prospect of insurmountable work; neither did I feel the Monday blues. As I now sit down and contemplate what was so different about that Monday, I can come up with only one answer: my trip to Lohgad. But then, I said to myself, how is it that after such a long and harrowing trip – being the smartasses that we are, we had gone on a Sunday and returned home at 2 a.m. the next day - instead of feeling drained and tired, I am feeling fresh and energetic. I know that most people will gape at me and wonder what is so tough about a mountain trip to Lohgad (it certainly can’t be called a trekking trip). Well, all I can say is that for someone like me who thinks that taking the stairs to my sixth floor office is a form of exercise, this was like climbing Mount Everest.
I would like to make a confession first. I am not too fond of climbing mountains. I don’t have a fear of heights, but somehow I feel much safer at sea level. I like to go on beaches. The vast expanse of the ocean always fascinates me. Sitting on the beach, reading a book, going for a swim in the sea, or just frolicking around; that’s the life for me. But as far as climbing mountains is concerned; well…to be quite honest, on my entire journey to the base of the mountain, all I can think about is how I am going to approach the climb. When I am climbing, I prefer not to talk as it may give away my nervousness; and when we finally make it to the top, all I think about is the routes that I am going to take while climbing down (especially at the stretches where we had a tough time climbing). I may cheer up a bit when we are taking lunch and stuff (Who doesn’t!!!), but all in all I can’t remember a single mountaineering experience where I have enjoyed myself completely. Somehow, I am just not sure of my footing and balance. It’s pathetic really, but true.
Now for those who don’t know, Lohgad is probably the easiest mountain to climb. Unless of course you want to be a bit adventurous and try to find new innovative routes up to the peak – which is the only way you can get some trekking done on Lohgad. You can take your car up to the base of the fort. This reminds me that I haven’t mentioned anything about Lohgad itself. Lohgad is a fort based near a small village named Malawali. It is one of the many hill forts that belonged to Shivaji. The actual fort begins in a village called Lohgaon. After climbing some 500 steps you can get to the very top of the fort. For more details on how to get there, please log on to Google maps or Wikipedia.
I won’t talk of any adventures that happened to me, because frankly speaking, there were none. My other friends had adventures; I was just a silent spectator making my way using the best possible routes. The one good thing about that day was that there was plenty of rain. I like rain when I am not in the city. A rainy day in the city is filled with dirty potholes, travelling in trains packed with wet, sweaty human beings, going to office with your jeans or trousers rolled up to your knees and several other detestable things not worth mentioning here. But a rainy day anywhere outside the city is a blissful experience. Taking in the smell of the earth, seeing the nature without the layer of dust on it, shedding all our inhibitions and getting wet in the rains; this is something which cannot be equaled even by a raise offered at our workplace. Add to that a cup of hot tea and piping hot vada pav, and my day is made.
But the one lasting memory in my mind is not the rain, the chai and vada pav or the constant anxiety that follows me every time I go for trekking. It’s the magnificent views that I got to see that day. Half way through our walk to the base of the fort, we came across a plateau which afforded a view of the surrounding mountains and the fort itself. With the clouds covering the peaks the view was indeed breathtaking. There is huge mountain right opposite to the fort – I can’t really remember its name – that was covered with clouds with only the front portion peeping out like the prow of a huge and ancient ship. But the finest view was seen from the top (isn’t it always?!). When we reached the top, it was all misty with the cloud cover giving everything an ethereal feel. There was a moment when the clouds broke apart and sunlight rushed through to reveal a magnificent landscape surrounding the mountain. It was like the nature had turned a magician that day and it had kept this final and the most spectacular trick till the last moment when the spellbound audiences would have thought that there are no more tricks in its bag. I am not sure whether there are such places as Heaven and Hell - if there are, then I am certainly going to Hell; for reasons I won’t go into. But I can say one thing for sure; Heaven cannot be more beautiful than this. I know there are many people who will say that they have seen much more beautiful places on their trekking trips; but being an amateur in this regard, I can only say that I haven’t seen anything better. And who knows, maybe this experience will encourage me to go no to better views.
I have uploaded a few pics taken by my friend and am sharing them here:
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Book Review: 'The Interpretation of Murder' by Jed Rubenfeld
The story starts with the day Freud arrives in New York, America along with two of his followers Carl Jung and Sandor Fereczi to lecture in the Clark University. The same night, a young girl of 17 is murdered in her plush apartment in the same city. The murder is even more gruesome because the girl is tied to the ceiling and whipped mercilessly. The very next day a similar attack takes place on Nora Acton, another 17 year old in her own house. She manages to scream out before the murderer could finish his work, and so the murderer has to flee. When the police attempt to interrogate the girl, it turns out that she has lost her voice and cannot remember anything that took place the previous day. That is when the Mayor of New York on learning that Sigmund Freud is in the city invites him to have a look at the girl. After examining the girl, Freud tells Younger to take over the case and helps him solve it. While Younger runs psychoanalytic treatment on Nora, Detective Littlemore attempts to trace down the murderer based on the clues that he finds on the body of the murdered girl before it mysteriously disappears. As expected, there is a romantic angle introduced with Stratham Younger and Nora Acton as the protagonists.
The story, being set in the early 1900’s New York, describes the architectural and the industrial revolution taking place at that time quite vividly. Also, the author has described the social strata and the general mindset of the people during that time quite succinctly. This was very important because it explains why the parents of the victim are so eager to cover the assault on her.
The book touches with a lot of psychoanalytical theories prevalent during that time. But, it mainly deals with the Oedipus complex theory which was propounded by Freud. This theory deals with the feeling and desires of any person to possess the parent of opposite sex and eliminate the parent of the same sex. The main plot – and several sub plots – deals with this same theory.
Most of the fictional characters described in this book are well sketched. However, their behavior is not quite consistent throughout the book, which makes you wonder whether the author changed the climax at the last moment. The behavior of other characters ofcourse is based on their real life counterparts. While Freud, Jung, Ferenczi and a few others existed in real life too, a few characters have been based on other real life characters. Quite a few events described in the book did take place in real life too; like the parting of ways between Freud and Jung. However, while in reality this event took place a few years after 1909, in the book this event has been shown as having occurred during their visit to America. There are a few other events which have similarly been postponed or preponed in order to accommodate them in the book. However, since these are related to the main plot of the book, I will not mention them here.
The biggest fault with the book is that the flow of the book is all confused. One moment you will have Younger having psychoanalytical sessions with Nora Acton, the other moment you will have Littlemore struggling on to find the murderer. The scenes tend to change with each paragraph, which is not something that you really want. Most readers would prefer a particular scene to go on for atleast 3-5 paragraphs. It’s almost as if Jed Rubenfeld is trying to create too much of mystery. And there he lets the reader down. Basically such books are supposed to be read while travelling and other hectic activities. However, the haphazard structuring of the book means that you can get lost easily. In fact, I would strongly recommend that you read this book only if you have time on your hand. If you plan to read this book haltingly, with a break of say a 4-5 days between two readings then it may be hard to keep up with the plot. Another fault, as I mentioned earlier, is that the characters are not consistent throughout the book. What I mean is that, during any character’s interaction with any other character, there is no hint given that he/she may turn out to be different. This is an error most mystery writers try to avoid since the surest way to lose readers is by creating a mystery so unfathomable that the reader cannot guess the solution by himself at all.
All in all, I would say the ‘The Interpretation of Murder’ could have been a much better book than it eventually turned out to be. Should you read it? Well, as I said, read it only if you can keep up with the confusing storyline, or else just give it a skip.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
A little too bland
"Each is less without the other, though the other may destroy him. The legacy of one must now become the legacy of the other. Trapped, they define each other."
Book Review: To Kill a Mockingbird.
The events take place in the early 1900’s when racism was prevalent in America. Scout is a six-year-old girl who lives with her father, Atticus Finch and her brother Jem. The initial part of the story tells us about the neighbors surrounding the Finches, especially the Radleys. The rumors about Boo Radley - the boy whom none of the good citizens of Maycomb County have seen - and the intriguing behavior of his parents, both fascinate and terrify Scout and Jem (though Jem does not readily show his fear). The arrival of Dill, a nephew of one of their neighbors’ and their growing friendship with him, not only creates a lot of curiosity among the two kids (regarding Dill’s past and his father), but also brings forth a hitherto unknown sense of adventure inside the two kids. Together, the three of them hatch various plans to bring Boo Radley out in the open. Their misadventures and the eventual circumstances which finally bring Boo Radley out of his house are indeed heartening to read.
Meanwhile, another event takes place which grabs the attention of all the Maycomb County (except our little adventurers). An African-American, Tom Robinson is accused of raping a white girl. The County Attorney appoints Atticus Finch as the defense attorney for Tom. Atticus’ decision to take up the defense causes a great uproar. From here on the story revolves around how Atticus has to deal with criticism and ridicule not only from his community, but also from his relatives. As always, there are a few people supporting Atticus, but they are reluctant to show public support to Atticus. Needless to say, even the two kids are dragged into this mire as they are teased and taunted by the townspeople and their friends. This is where Lee is different compared to the authors. By common experience, most authors would have introduced a tinge of drama, people physically manhandling the kids, which would provoke Atticus to make a great speech in the town center with the townspeople watching all around him etc.(yes, these thing also happen in books, and not only in movies!). But, she has stuck to facts and portrayed how such a situation can be handled without losing one’s sense of pride and dignity. The situation becomes grimmer for Scout with the arrival of her aunt who is determined the turn Scout – who is a tomboy – into an elegant lady. Scout’s plight on being invited to numerous afternoon tea parties is quite funny to read.
Another powerful message that emerges from the book as it moves on is how the hatred prevalent amongst the society can effectively destroy innocence. The events that unfold during Tom’s trial (which they watch secretly), make a profound impact on Jem. His transformation from a carefree, and headstrong boy to a mature and thinking teen is beautifully portrayed and without any drama. Also, the exemplary behavior of Atticus goes a long way in influencing Jem. Indeed, the way in which Atticus treats the whole situation at hand should serve as a reminder to the society today, which at times takes the right decisions in the wrong manner thus having a wrong impact on the younger generation.
The characters are well sketched out. Atticus Finch as the morally upright lawyer, determined to imbibe in his children a sense of tolerance, and the sense to treat all human beings equally, is brilliantly written. The way he handles his kids, when Jem is rude to an elderly woman who calls Atticus ‘nigger-lover’ or when Scout asks him the meaning of ‘rape’ is brilliantly portrayed. I believe that he is one of the finest heroes crafted both in written literature and visual entertainment including our childhood heroes like Superman, Batman etc. Jem Finch as firstly the friendly and loving elder brother, then the secretive and slightly embarrassed elder brother to the protective and mature elder brother tends to remind us of ourselves during the same stages of life. Scout, with her inquisitiveness, stubbornness, and quarrelsome nature in endearing. The character of Dill, though he appears inconsequential at first, gains prominence later on. All the other minor characters are well sketched out with different quirks and human frailties.
Briefly put, the book is funny, touching and can leave a deep impact on the reader’s psyche without appearing to be preachy. I would definitely recommend it to all book lovers.